👨🏻🏫[Charlotte cleaned her house]指'Charlotte'是清潔之人; 但[Charlotte had her house cleaned]就唔一係'Charlotte'親手清潔,因句子單單表述Charlotte導致她間屋被清潔🤓
👨🏻🏫學生們注意[active voice]和[passive voice]和[had sth done]之間的分別🤔
1️⃣[Active voice]
1a)Mr.Lee stole a car.🦹🏻♂️
1b)Somebody stole Mr.Lee's car.🙍🏻♂️
2️⃣[Passive voice]
2a)A car was stolen by Mr. Lee.🦹🏻♂️
2b)Mr.Lee's car was stolen by somebody.🙍🏻♂️
3️⃣[Had sth done]
3a)Mr.Lee had a car stolen.🦹🏻♂️
3b)Mr.Lee had his car stolen.🙍🏻♂️
💡注意3a)[Mr.Lee had a car stolen] 和 3b)[Mr.Lee had his car stolen] 只是一字之差但有天淵之別🤔
💡3a)反映Mr.Lee是壞人🦹🏻♂️,Mr.Lee仍是句子主角,他導到一輛車被偷去
💡3b)反映Mr.Lee是受害者🙍🏻♂️,Mr.Lee的車被偷去,注意Mr.Lee仍是句子主角,他可能大意忘了鎖車所以導致車被偷去
💡正如[Sam had a pen broken], Sam是'壞角色'🦹🏻♂️, 他導致(別人的)一支筆被破毀,原兇可以係Sam或Sam主使的人; 相反[Sam had his pen broken]反映Sam是'不幸者'🙍🏻♂️,他(自己的)筆被破毀了
🙋🏻♀️哪麼2b)[Mr.Lee's car was stolen by somebody🙍🏻♂️] 和 3b)[Mr.Lee had his car stolen🙍🏻♂️]都是講述他的車被偷去,有分別嗎?
👨🏻🏫當然有別, 在2b)Mr.Lee非句子主角, 他與這失車意外完全無關; 相反在3b)Mr.Lee是句子主角(subject),他是做了些不小心事而令這車輛被盜(可能忘了關窗或鎖車等等)